The Six Sins of Greenwashing
- BAD TRADE-OFFS
In other words, you can claim something is green in one way - i.e. more energy efficient - but you neglect to mention that achieving this creates an offsetting sacrifice somewhere else, such as increased toxic materials. TerraChoice found that 57 per cent of products committed this sin.
- ZERO PROOF.
A claim of being "green" is not backed up with any kind of proof or certification to verify it. It was found that 26 per cent of products committed this sin.
- VAGUENESS.
Emphasizing one characteristic of a product that makes it appear green - i.e. it's all-natural - but neglecting to point out that it's still not good for the environment. It was found that 11 per cent committed this sin.
- IRRELEVANCE.
A product claiming to be green when this aspect of the product does not distinguish it in the marketplace. For example, biodegradable coffee filters. This was seen in 4 per cent of products.
- FLAT OUT LYING.
I think this speaks for itself, but an example would be a company claiming to be certified organic or rated Energy Star when in fact it's not. Fortunately less than 1 per cent committed this sin.
- LESSER THAN TWO EVILS.
That is, "evil" products like cigarettes, leaf blowers, Hummers, and bottled water that are given a green tweak to justify green marketing campaigns - i.e. organic cigarettes, electric leaf blowers, hybrid Hummers and biodegradable plastic bottles.